1. A. Wallberg, M. Thollesson, J. Farris, U. Jondelius, The phylogenetic position of the comb jellies (Ctenophora) and the importance of taxonomic sampling. Cladistics. 20, 558–578 (2004).
2. C. W. Dunn, A. Hejnol, D. Q. Matus, K. Pang, W. E. Browne, S. A. Smith, E. Seaver, G. W. Rouse, M. Obst, G. D. Edgecombe, M. V. Sørensen, S. H. D. Haddock, A. Schmidt-Rhaesa, A. Okusu, R. M. Kristensen, W. C. Wheeler, M. Q. Martindale, G. Giribet, Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature. 452, 745–749 (2008).
3. N. King, A. Rokas, Embracing Uncertainty in Reconstructing Early Animal Evolution. Current biology : CB. 27, R1081–R1088 (2017).
4. M. Podar, S. H. Haddock, M. L. Sogin, G. R. Harbison, A molecular phylogenetic framework for the phylum ctenophora using 18S rRNA genes. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution. 21, 218–230 (2001).
5. D. Pisani, W. Pett, M. Dohrmann, R. Feuda, O. Rota-Stabelli, H. Philippe, N. Lartillot, G. Wörheide, Genomic data do not support comb jellies as the sister group to all other animals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 112, 15402–15407 (2015).
6. N. V. Whelan, K. M. Halanych, Who let the cat out of the bag? Accurately dealing with substitutional heterogeneity in phylogenomic analyses. Systematic biology. 66, 232–255 (2016).
7. R. Feuda, M. Dohrmann, W. Pett, H. Philippe, O. Rota-Stabelli, N. Lartillot, G. Wörheide, D. Pisani, Improved modeling of compositional heterogeneity supports sponges as sister to all other animals. Current Biology. 27, 3864–3870 (2017).
8. K. S. Pick, H. Philippe, F. Schreiber, D. Erpenbeck, D. J. Jackson, P. Wrede, M. Wiens, A. Alie, B. Morgenstern, M. Manuel, G. Worheide, Improved phylogenomic taxon sampling noticeably affects nonbilaterian relationships. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 27 (2010), doi:10.1093/molbev/msq089.
9. N. Lartillot, A Bayesian Mixture Model for Across-Site Heterogeneities in the Amino-Acid Replacement Process. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 21, 1095–1109 (2004).
10. S. W. Graham, R. G. Olmstead, S. C. Barrett, Rooting phylogenetic trees with distant outgroups: A case study from the commelinoid monocots. Molecular biology and evolution. 19, 1769–1781 (2002).
11. J. F. Ryan, K. Pang, C. E. Schnitzler, A.-D. Nguyen, R. T. Moreland, D. K. Simmons, B. J. Koch, W. R. Francis, P. Havlak, S. A. Smith, others, The genome of the ctenophore mnemiopsis leidyi and its implications for cell type evolution. Science. 342, 1242592 (2013).
12. L.-T. Nguyen, H. A. Schmidt, A. von Haeseler, B. Q. Minh, IQ-tree: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular biology and evolution. 32, 268–274 (2014).
13. X. Zhou, X.-X. Shen, C. T. Hittinger, A. Rokas, Evaluating fast maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic programs using empirical phylogenomic data sets. Molecular biology and evolution. 35, 486–503 (2017).
14. L. Si Quang, O. Gascuel, N. Lartillot, Empirical profile mixture models for phylogenetic reconstruction. Bioinformatics. 24, 2317–2323 (2008).
15. S. Kalyaanamoorthy, B. Q. Minh, T. K. Wong, A. von Haeseler, L. S. Jermiin, ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature methods. 14, 587 (2017).
16. H. Philippe, R. Derelle, P. Lopez, K. Pick, C. Borchiellini, N. Boury-Esnault, J. Vacelet, E. Renard, E. Houliston, E. QuEinnec, C. Da Silva, P. Wincker, H. Le Guyader, S. Leys, D. J. Jackson, F. Schreiber, D. Erpenbeck, B. Morgenstern, G. WOrheide, M. Manuel, Phylogenomics revives traditional views on deep animal relationships. Current biology : CB. 19, 706–712 (2009).
17. T. Nosenko, F. Schreiber, M. Adamska, M. Adamski, M. Eitel, J. Hammel, M. Maldonado, W. E. Müller, M. Nickel, B. Schierwater, others, Deep metazoan phylogeny: When different genes tell different stories. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution. 67, 223–233 (2013).
18. P. Simion, H. Philippe, D. Baurain, M. Jager, D. J. Richter, A. Di Franco, B. Roure, N. Satoh, E. Queinnec, A. Ereskovsky, others, A large and consistent phylogenomic dataset supports sponges as the sister group to all other animals. Current Biology. 27, 958–967 (2017).
19. N. Lartillot, T. Lepage, S. Blanquart, PhyloBayes 3: A bayesian software package for phylogenetic reconstruction and molecular dating. Bioinformatics. 25, 2286–2288 (2009).
20. X.-X. Shen, C. T. Hittinger, A. Rokas, Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 1, 0126 (2017).
21. R. Feuda, M. Dohrmann, W. Pett, H. Philippe, O. Rota-Stabelli, N. Lartillot, G. Wörheide, D. Pisani, Improved Modeling of Compositional Heterogeneity Supports Sponges as Sister to All Other Animals. Current Biology. 27, 1–12 (2017).
22. E. Susko, A. J. Roger, On reduced amino acid alphabets for phylogenetic inference. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 24, 2139–2150 (2007).
23. A. M. Hernandez, J. F. Ryan, Six-state amino acid recoding is not an effective strategy to offset the effects of compositional heterogeneity and saturation in phylogenetic analyses. BioRxiv, 729103 (2019).
24. C. E. Laumer, R. Fernández, S. Lemer, D. Combosch, K. M. Kocot, A. Riesgo, S. C. Andrade, W. Sterrer, M. V. Sørensen, G. Giribet, Revisiting metazoan phylogeny with genomic sampling of all phyla. Proceedings of the royal society B. 286, 20190831 (2019).
26. C. Camacho, G. Coulouris, V. Avagyan, N. Ma, J. Papadopoulos, K. Bealer, T. L. Madden, BLAST+: Architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics. 10, 421 (2009).
27. B. Boeckmann, A. Bairoch, R. Apweiler, M.-C. Blatter, A. Estreicher, E. Gasteiger, M. J. Martin, K. Michoud, C. O’Donovan, I. Phan, others, The swiss-prot protein knowledgebase and its supplement trembl in 2003. Nucleic acids research. 31, 365–370 (2003).
28. A. A. Hagberg, D. A. Schult, P. J. Swart, in Proceedings of the 7th python in science conference, G. Varoquaux, T. Vaught, J. Millman, Eds. (Pasadena, CA USA, 2008), pp. 11–15.
29. S. A. Smith, N. Walker-Hale, J. F. Walker, J. W. Brown, Phylogenetic conflicts, combinability, and deep phylogenomics in plants. Systematic Biology. 69, 579–592 (2020).
30. G. Yu, T. T.-Y. Lam, H. Zhu, Y. Guan, Two methods for mapping and visualizing associated data on phylogeny using ggtree. Molecular biology and evolution. 35, 3041–3043 (2018).
31. A. Enright, S. Van Dongen, C. Ouzounis, An efficient algorithm for large-scale detection of protein families. Nucleic Acids Research. 30, 1575–1584 (2002).
32. J. Castresana, Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 17, 540–552 (2000).
33. J. Thorley, M. Wilkinson, Testing the phylogenetic stability of early tetrapods. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 200, 343–344 (1999).
34. S. A. Smith, C. W. Dunn, Phyutility: a phyloinformatics tool for trees, alignments and molecular data. Bioinformatics. 24, 715–716 (2008).
35. F. Ronquist, J. P. Huelsenbeck, MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 19, 1572–1574 (2003).
36. A. Stamatakis, RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics. 22, 2688–2690 (2006).
37. A. Hejnol, M. Obst, A. Stamatakis, M. Ott, G. W. Rouse, G. D. Edgecombe, P. Martinez, J. Baguñà, X. Bailly, U. Jondelius, others, Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylogenomic methods. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 276, 4261–4270 (2009).
38. F. Schreiber, K. Pick, D. Erpenbeck, G. Wörheide, B. Morgenstern, OrthoSelect: A protocol for selecting orthologous groups in phylogenomics. BMC bioinformatics. 10, 219 (2009).
39. L. L. Moroz, K. M. Kocot, M. R. Citarella, S. Dosung, T. P. Norekian, I. S. Povolotskaya, A. P. Grigorenko, C. Dailey, E. Berezikov, K. M. Buckley, others, The ctenophore genome and the evolutionary origins of neural systems. Nature. 510, 109 (2014).
40. I. Ebersberger, S. Strauss, A. von Haeseler, HaMStR: Profile hidden markov model based search for orthologs in ests. BMC evolutionary biology. 9, 157 (2009).
42. J. C. Chiu, E. K. Lee, M. G. Egan, I. N. Sarkar, G. M. Coruzzi, R. DeSalle, OrthologID: Automation of genome-scale ortholog identification within a parsimony framework. Bioinformatics. 22, 699–707 (2006).
43. N. V. Whelan, K. M. Kocot, L. L. Moroz, K. M. Halanych, Error, signal, and the placement of ctenophora sister to all other animals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 112, 5773–5778 (2015).
44. E. S. Chang, M. Neuhof, N. D. Rubinstein, A. Diamant, H. Philippe, D. Huchon, P. Cartwright, Genomic insights into the evolutionary origin of Myxozoa within Cnidaria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1–6 (2015).
45. H. Philippe, H. Brinkmann, D. V. Lavrov, D. T. J. Littlewood, M. Manuel, G. Wörheide, D. Baurain, Resolving difficult phylogenetic questions: Why more sequences are not enough. PLoS biology. 9, e1000602 (2011).
46. N. V. Whelan, K. M. Kocot, T. P. Moroz, K. Mukherjee, P. Williams, G. Paulay, L. L. Moroz, K. M. Halanych, Ctenophore relationships and their placement as the sister group to all other animals. Nature ecology & evolution. 1, 1737 (2017).
47. J. Felsenstein, Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. Journal of Molecular Evolution. 17, 368–376 (1981).
48. S. Whelan, N. Goldman, A General Empirical Model of Protein Evolution Derived from Multiple Protein Families Using a Maximum-Likelihood Approach. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 18, 691–699 (2001).
49. S. Q. Le, O. Gascuel, An improved general amino acid replacement matrix. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 25, 1307–1320 (2008).
50. N. V. Whelan, K. M. Kocot, L. L. Moroz, K. M. Halanych, Error, signal, and the placement of Ctenophora sister to all other animals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 112, 201503453–6 (2015).
51. J. P. Bollback, Bayesian model adequacy and choice in phylogenetics. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 19, 1171–1180 (2002).
52. S. Blanquart, N. Lartillot, A Site- and Time-Heterogeneous Model of Amino Acid Replacement. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 25, 842–858 (2008).
53. P. G. Foster, Modeling compositional heterogeneity. Systematic biology. 53, 485–495 (2004).